The responses always claim that the BitTorrent protocol behaves in a different way than the other filesharing protocols used in earlier cases which were severed for misjoinder. One thing made me want update my Motion to Quash template. It came from a decision I quoted, that was written by a federal judge who presided over one of their BitTorrent lawsuits.
P 45…” in reference to the part in my motion about their abuse of the litigation system, which I didn’t even write. Some funny bits in their responses, such as “The list of permissible grounds for quashing or modifying a subpoena does not include ad hominem attacks See Fed. I’ve gotten quite a few emails from people who have used my motion to quash template, and I’ve also read responses from Steele Hansmeier that readers have forwarded me. Yesterday he emailed an updated version with the following explanation: A couple of weeks ago I published the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena template that this blog’s reader, Sy Ableman, created.
0 kommentar(er)
